<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging, Reviews, and Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html</link>
	<description>Runner, Dad, Geek, Books, and Memphis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 14:19:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica - Jessica Knows</title>
		<link>http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica - Jessica Knows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/2009/04/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html#comment-2520</guid>
		<description>Great post.  People are acting like blogging is so different from traditional media.&lt;br /&gt;It is.  And it isn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;Didn&#039;t our moms always tell us not to believe everything we read in the paper or see on TV?&lt;br /&gt;Everything is open to interpretation.  Bloggers can&#039;t go wrong if they let a strong sense of integrity and an authentic voice lead their actions.&lt;br /&gt;Now, if only we could get the Wall Street Journal to disclose and be transparent about the articles they&#039;re actually writing...because the article that came out is not what the reporter told me it was going to be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You rock (and psssst...you are big time!)  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  People are acting like blogging is so different from traditional media.<br />It is.  And it isn&#8217;t.<br />Didn&#8217;t our moms always tell us not to believe everything we read in the paper or see on TV?<br />Everything is open to interpretation.  Bloggers can&#8217;t go wrong if they let a strong sense of integrity and an authentic voice lead their actions.<br />Now, if only we could get the Wall Street Journal to disclose and be transparent about the articles they&#8217;re actually writing&#8230;because the article that came out is not what the reporter told me it was going to be.</p>
<p>You rock (and psssst&#8230;you are big time!)  <img src='http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/2009/04/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>I think I tend to get more value from blogs and personal review sites for information on products. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like the post explains, there could be hidden motives and agendas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I tend to get more value from blogs and personal review sites for information on products. </p>
<p>Like the post explains, there could be hidden motives and agendas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2516</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/2009/04/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html#comment-2516</guid>
		<description>I 100% agree with everything you said.  I might not have ever heard of Boogie Wipes if not for a a blog or Pineapple Jerky!  If I am not interested I move onto the next blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I 100% agree with everything you said.  I might not have ever heard of Boogie Wipes if not for a a blog or Pineapple Jerky!  If I am not interested I move onto the next blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2515</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/2009/04/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html#comment-2515</guid>
		<description>I definitely don&#039;t mind posting product reviews or reading them. Because of other bloggers I&#039;ve learned about some really great products I might not have known about before. When it comes gift time for my kids I always have a go-to list thanks to that. I see absolutely nothing wrong with it.. it&#039;s like any other blog post really- if they don&#039;t want to read it go on to the next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely don&#8217;t mind posting product reviews or reading them. Because of other bloggers I&#8217;ve learned about some really great products I might not have known about before. When it comes gift time for my kids I always have a go-to list thanks to that. I see absolutely nothing wrong with it.. it&#8217;s like any other blog post really- if they don&#8217;t want to read it go on to the next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2514</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/2009/04/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html#comment-2514</guid>
		<description>I do blog my own thoughts.  I have no problem doing a negative review and have no problem being truthful.  If a company doesn&#039;t want a negative review than I say make a product/service that is good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I read Chris Brogran&#039;s K-Mart post and really had no problem with it.  I thought it was fair and balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do blog my own thoughts.  I have no problem doing a negative review and have no problem being truthful.  If a company doesn&#8217;t want a negative review than I say make a product/service that is good.</p>
<p>I read Chris Brogran&#8217;s K-Mart post and really had no problem with it.  I thought it was fair and balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EcoMemphis</title>
		<link>http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/featured/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>EcoMemphis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buckdaddyblog.com/2009/04/blogging-reviews-and-transparency.html#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>I think a single statement you made is indeed the point. Radio and print advertising are dying - because consumers can&#039;t trust the ads. Journalism is changing since readers can&#039;t trust the motivations of the editor (ie, who his golfing buddy is, or who is a large advertiser and how that changes editorial). According to Forrester research, readers don&#039;t really trust corporate blogs. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your readers need to be able to trust you. Not only which products are good, but also which products you would not recommend. Personally, I don&#039;t care that you&#039;re paid to review, but I think you ought to blog your own thoughts - not what your sponsor want you to say. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not too long ago, Chris Brogan was publicly slammed because of his K-Mart post. I&#039;m not sure why. He wasn&#039;t totally positive of his review. Among other points, he mentioned the only thing he bought that HE would actually wear were Joe Boxer underwear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a single statement you made is indeed the point. Radio and print advertising are dying &#8211; because consumers can&#8217;t trust the ads. Journalism is changing since readers can&#8217;t trust the motivations of the editor (ie, who his golfing buddy is, or who is a large advertiser and how that changes editorial). According to Forrester research, readers don&#8217;t really trust corporate blogs. </p>
<p>Your readers need to be able to trust you. Not only which products are good, but also which products you would not recommend. Personally, I don&#8217;t care that you&#8217;re paid to review, but I think you ought to blog your own thoughts &#8211; not what your sponsor want you to say. </p>
<p>Not too long ago, Chris Brogan was publicly slammed because of his K-Mart post. I&#8217;m not sure why. He wasn&#8217;t totally positive of his review. Among other points, he mentioned the only thing he bought that HE would actually wear were Joe Boxer underwear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

